'No hearing, no vote'
- Lindsey Graham after closed-door meeting with Mitch McConnell, the majority leader in the Senate
- Lindsey Graham after closed-door meeting with Mitch McConnell, the majority leader in the Senate
'GOP ready for war with White
House
...president is determined to nominate a replacement for Antonin Scalia.'
...president is determined to nominate a replacement for Antonin Scalia.'
Senate Republicans prepare for all-out war with Obama over
replacing Justice Scalia as leaders say they won't even have a hearing
on anyone he nominates
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (left) vowed to do nothing to
replace Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court bench, a move certain to
infuriate President Obama (right), who is going to nominate anyway
President Barack Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court won't get a hearing or a vote from the Republican-led Senate, GOP members of the Judiciary Committee said Tuesday as they insisted only the next president must fill the vacancy.
We believe
the American people need to decide who is going to make this appointment
rather than a lame-duck president,' said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the
Senate's No. 2 Republican and like Graham, a member of the Judiciary
Committee.
President Barack Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court won't get a hearing or a vote from the Republican-led Senate, GOP members of the Judiciary Committee said Tuesday as they insisted only the next president must fill the vacancy.
'No hearing, no vote,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, as he emerged from a closed-door meeting with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Even
the most divisive nominees for the high court have received a hearing
before the Judiciary Committee, and the election-year decision to deny
such a session is a sharp break with the Senate's traditional 'advise
and consent' role. A committee review and a hearing is the first step
in the process.
"During
my time on the committee, we have never refused to send a Supreme Court
nominee to the full Senate for a confirmation vote, even when the
majority of the committee opposed the nomination." "And once
reported to the full Senate, every Supreme Court nominee has received
an up or down confirmation vote during my more than four decades in the
Senate."
- Patrick Leahy (I-Vt),Top Judiciary Committee Democrat
- Patrick Leahy (I-Vt),Top Judiciary Committee Democrat
Hearings would be 'a waste of time,' added Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
As
a rationale for their decision, Republicans pointed to a 1992 speech by
Vice President Joe Biden, then the chairman of the Judiciary Committee,
in which Biden said that in a presidential election year the Senate
should 'not consider holding hearings until after the election.'
'Instead,
it would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the political season is
under way, and it is, action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put
off until after the election campaign is over,' said Biden, then the
Delaware senator.
As it turned out, there was no opening on the court that year.
Earlier
in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme
Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead 'revisit the matter'
after the presidential election in November.
'Presidents
have a right to nominate just as the Senate has its constitutional
right to provide or withhold consent,' the majority leader said in a
speech on the Senate floor. 'In this case, the Senate will withhold it.'
Scalia's
unexpected Feb. 13 death ignited a major fight in Washington over
whether Obama should be able to replace him in a presidential election
year. McConnell offered one of the first salvos; Scalia had only been
dead for a few hours when McConnell announced that he would oppose
replacing him before the election.
But McConnell's remarks Tuesday were his first explicit statement that he would oppose a Senate vote.
Photo: getty Images
Vacancy: The president did not attend Justice Scalia's funeral at
Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception but now
faces months of deadlock over the replacement
McConnell
was at the center of a battle a decade ago over Democratic filibusters
of judicial nominees of President George W. Bush and, after Democrats
took over the chamber in 2007, repeatedly said Bush's judges deserved up
or down votes.
Top Judiciary Committee Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont said the GOP's promised obstruction was unprecedented.
Courtesy: Mail
No comments:
Post a Comment