'No hearing, no vote' 
- Lindsey Graham after closed-door meeting with Mitch McConnell, the majority leader in the Senate
 
- Lindsey Graham after closed-door meeting with Mitch McConnell, the majority leader in the Senate
'GOP ready for war with White
 House 
...president is determined to nominate a replacement for Antonin Scalia.'
...president is determined to nominate a replacement for Antonin Scalia.'
Senate Republicans prepare for all-out war with Obama over 
replacing Justice Scalia as leaders say they won't even have a hearing 
on anyone he nominates 


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (left) vowed to do nothing to 
replace Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court bench, a move certain to 
infuriate President Obama (right), who is going to nominate anyway
President Barack Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court won't get a hearing or a vote from the Republican-led Senate, GOP members of the Judiciary Committee said Tuesday as they insisted only the next president must fill the vacancy.
We believe 
the American people need to decide who is going to make this appointment
 rather than a lame-duck president,' said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the
 Senate's No. 2 Republican and like Graham, a member of the Judiciary 
Committee.
President Barack Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court won't get a hearing or a vote from the Republican-led Senate, GOP members of the Judiciary Committee said Tuesday as they insisted only the next president must fill the vacancy.
'No hearing, no vote,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, as he emerged from a closed-door meeting with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Even
 the most divisive nominees for the high court have received a hearing 
before the Judiciary Committee, and the election-year decision to deny 
such a session is a sharp break with the Senate's traditional 'advise 
and consent' role.  A committee review and a hearing is the first step 
in the process.
 "During
 my time on the committee, we have never refused to send a Supreme Court
 nominee to the full Senate for a confirmation vote, even when the 
majority of the committee opposed the nomination." "And once
 reported to the full Senate, every Supreme Court nominee has received 
an up or down confirmation vote during my more than four decades in the 
Senate." 
- Patrick Leahy (I-Vt),Top Judiciary Committee Democrat
- Patrick Leahy (I-Vt),Top Judiciary Committee Democrat
Hearings would be 'a waste of time,' added Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
As
 a rationale for their decision, Republicans pointed to a 1992 speech by
 Vice President Joe Biden, then the chairman of the Judiciary Committee,
 in which Biden said that in a presidential election year the Senate 
should 'not consider holding hearings until after the election.'
'Instead,
 it would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the political season is 
under way, and it is, action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put 
off until after the election campaign is over,' said Biden, then the 
Delaware senator.
As it turned out, there was no opening on the court that year.
Earlier
 in the day, McConnell said his party won't permit a vote on any Supreme
 Court nominee submitted by Obama and will instead 'revisit the matter' 
after the presidential election in November.
'Presidents
 have a right to nominate just as the Senate has its constitutional 
right to provide or withhold consent,' the majority leader said in a 
speech on the Senate floor. 'In this case, the Senate will withhold it.'
Scalia's
 unexpected Feb. 13 death ignited a major fight in Washington over 
whether Obama should be able to replace him in a presidential election 
year. McConnell offered one of the first salvos; Scalia had only been 
dead for a few hours when McConnell announced that he would oppose 
replacing him before the election.
But McConnell's remarks Tuesday were his first explicit statement that he would oppose a Senate vote.

 Photo: getty Images
Vacancy: The president did not attend Justice Scalia's funeral at 
Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception but now 
faces months of deadlock over the replacement
McConnell 
was at the center of a battle a decade ago over Democratic filibusters 
of judicial nominees of President George W. Bush and, after Democrats 
took over the chamber in 2007, repeatedly said Bush's judges deserved up
 or down votes.
Top Judiciary Committee Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont said the GOP's promised obstruction was unprecedented.
 Courtesy: Mail
No comments:
Post a Comment